Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 21, 1962No. 5086Published

1DissentKirkpatrick, Judge

I do not question that the importations now before the court possess considerable beauty and artistic character and would, by most people, be called “works of art.” However, a reading of the multitude of decisions dealing with the phrase, “works of art,” in the various tariff statutes convinces me that the term has acquired a rather narrowly limited meaning. It is not possible to find a decision precisely in point and it is true that in a number of the opinions which discuss the law what is said about the meaning of the term might be properly described as dicta. Nevertheless, even if it be so…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reardon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API