Legal Opinion

Hill v. McMahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1903No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Nicholas McMahon, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Fulton Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Washington on the '7th day of November, 1902, denying the defendant’s motion for an order amending the judgment theretofore entered herein by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Chester, J.:

The action is for a trespass on land. The complaint is in the usual form. It alleges, first, that the plaintiff since the 13th day of February, 1898, has been and still is the owner and in possession of *326certain premises described therein, and second, that the defendant between the 13th day of February, 1898, and the 1st day of August, 1901, at many and various days wrongfully entered upon such premises and without the leave of plaintiff did cut down and carry away a, number of trees of the value of $150, and damaged plaintiff’s lands to the amount of $25. A money judgment for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. President of the Williamsburgh Turnpike Road & Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Farrell v. HillNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Socony Burner Corp. v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Hill v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API