Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Kerby

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1942No. 4-6587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

There is no disputed question of fact in this case, indeed, the controlling facts are recited in a stipulation and are to'the following effect.

George W. Dougless owned the original title to the lot here in controversy, hut failed to pay the general taxes due thereon for the year 1932. The lot was sold to the state in 1933 for these taxes, and this forfeiture was duly certified after the expiration of the time for redemption. The lot was purchased from the state by and was conveyed to C. L. Ellison by the state land commissioner on September 17, 1936. Ellison conveyed to A. P. Wasen who, on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adamson v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Sherrill v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Wilson v. Triplett, TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Baum v. YarberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Sage Land & Lumber Co. v. HickeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API