Legal Opinion
Acosta v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 23, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Court of Claims of the State of New York, New York County (S. Michael Nadel, J.), entered on or about March 31, 1999, which, in an action under the Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Act of 1984 (Court of Claims Act § 8-b), granted claimant’s motion to vacate a prior order, same court and Judge, sua sponte dismissing the claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 8-b (4) on the ground that claimant was not likely to succeed at trial, and restored the claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
*165Where claimant’s ultimate submission satisfied the factual showing required by Court of Claims…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reed v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Framapac Delicatessen, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Cannon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1994
- Diaz v. New York Downtown HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Albright v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2011
- Simmons v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2007
- Alvira v. Residential ManagementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hopwah v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 2024