Burton v. Pond
Supreme Court of Connecticut
MOTION for a new trial, This was an action of ejectment for a certain piece of land *n MíJ/bn/. The plaintiffs claimed title to the land in quest-lion, by virtue of the levy of an execution, in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendant On the trial before the Superior Court, the rendering of the judgment, on which the execution issue»!, and the levy of the execution, were admitted.
Read the full summary
MOTION for a new trial, This was an action of ejectment for a certain piece of land *n MíJ/bn/. The plaintiffs claimed title to the land in quest-lion, by virtue of the levy of an execution, in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendant On the trial before the Superior Court, the rendering of the judgment, on which the execution issue»!, and the levy of the execution, were admitted. It was, also, admitted, that on the 15th day of June, 1809, and before the commence-men; uf (i-P present action, the execution, with the officer’s teíurn, was duly recorded, at full length, in the records of…
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, .1.
This was an action of ejectment ; a;ul the plHÍntills claimed title iiv virtue ol’i'ic levy of an execution. The action was Drought after the execution was returned to the office of the clerk of the County Court, from whence it was issued, and before it was recorded at full length. An. entry was made on the hack of the execution, in these winds : “ Received for ricord, (lie 15th day of June, 1809, and recorded by John H. Lynde, Clerk.”
The court below', admitted parol evidence to prove the fact, that the execution was not recorded at full length, when the present action was…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Coe v. StowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Morton v. EdwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846