Legal Opinion

Bolling v. Westchester Fire Insurance

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 9, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 2239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a diversity action, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) (1), (c), by the plaintiff, as third-party beneficiary thereunder, for the reformation of a Texas contract of public liability insurance on an automobile between the defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company and its insured Jose Castillo. The issues were tried by the Court without a jury on June 16, 1969. Final briefs were received September 11, 1969.

Mr. Castillo is a Cuban refugee who speaks virtually no, and understands but little, English.1 He purchased, in his name, for the use of his daughter Sara…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Boyle General Tire Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luke v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1971
  2. Florida International Indemnity Company v. The City Of MetterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Florida International Indemnity Co. v. City of MetterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API