Legal Opinion · Dissent

Atlanta Chemical Co. v. Hardin Bag Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1934No. 23499Published

1DissentJenkins, P. J.

Under the Civil Code (1910), § 4106, expressing the general law, “an identification of the thing sold” and “an agreement as to the price to be paid” must coexist with “consent of the parties,” in order to constitute a valid contract of sale. Where in a contract for the sale and purchase of goods there is no agreement as to the identity of the thing sold, an action for breach of the contract by refusal to accept a tender of the goods is not maintainable. Willard Bag &c. Co. v. Empire State Guano Co., 24 Ga. App. 34 (99 S. E. 713); United Roofing Co. v. Albany Mill Supply Co., 18 Ga. App. 184…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albany Mill Supply Co. v. United Roofing & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Durkee Famous Foods Inc. v. Selig Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. United Roofing & Manufacturing Co. v. Albany Mill Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Willard Bag & Manufacturing Co. v. Empire State Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API