Legal Opinion

Sherman & Davis v. Union National Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the chancery court of Yazoo county. Hon. Warren Cowan, Chancellor. E. M. Hogan & Co. owned land in Yazoo county, and on February 15, 1885, they executed a mortgage on the same to appellee, the Union National Bank, of New Orleans, but the mortgage was not filed for record until July 4, 1885. Meantime, on February 26, appellants, Sherman & Davis, sued out an attachment against Hogan & Co. in the circuit court of Lincoln county, and a branch writ was issued to Yazoo…

Read the full summary

From the chancery court of Yazoo county. Hon. Warren Cowan, Chancellor. E. M. Hogan & Co. owned land in Yazoo county, and on February 15, 1885, they executed a mortgage on the same to appellee, the Union National Bank, of New Orleans, but the mortgage was not filed for record until July 4, 1885. Meantime, on February 26, appellants, Sherman & Davis, sued out an attachment against Hogan & Co. in the circuit court of Lincoln county, and a branch writ was issued to Yazoo county, on which the sheriff returned that he had summoned certain persons as garnishees; and, as to the land, he made the…

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Affirmed : Henderson v. Thornton, 37 Miss. 448 ; Gates v. Flint, 39 Miss. 365.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson, Terry & Co. v. ThorntonMississippi Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Gates v. FlintMississippi Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peoples Bank v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API