Legal Opinion

Willis v. City of Rochester

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Aotioh for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff as a stockholder in the Rochester Electric Railway Company on behalf of himself and all other stockholders similarly situated, and of said railway company, to have subdivision 2 of section 7 of chapter 359 of the Laws of 1915 adjudged unconstitutional and to enjoin its enforcement by the city of Rochester; also to enjoin the defendant New York State Railways from abrogating and cancelling a certain lease existing between it and Rochester Electric Railway Company. Plaintiff now asks for an injunction pending the trial of the action.

Subdivision 2 of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York & Long Island Bridge Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. The People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. City of Rochester v. BlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. People ex rel. Squires v. HandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Braffett v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willis v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API