Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Huntington

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 23, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The testatrix was domiciled in California. Her will created a trust in the sum of two million dollars for the life use of her son Archer, and, in the circumstances which have now come to pass, gave to him a general testamentary power to appoint the corpus.. Archer Huntington died a resident of Connecticut, leaving a will which made no mention of the power to appoint this trust fund. His will has been admitted to probate in Connecticut. The question now at issue is whether he exercised the power of appointment, and if so, to what extent the appointment is valid.

At first…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Darling v. Rogers & SagoryCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  2. Lockwood v. . MildebergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Estate of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Childs v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Estate of TroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1981
  2. In re the Estate of SheedyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  3. Estate of BirdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Tiffany v. Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of NorrieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API