In Re Scott
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RIBLET, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue presented is whether the debt- or may utilize 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1) to avoid a Family Law Attorney’s Real Property Lien recorded, according to California law, by his former spouse’s family law counsel. I conclude that the debtor may not avoid such a lien and, accordingly, deny his motion.
I. FACTS
Debtor filed his voluntary chapter 7 petition on March 19, 2008. The initially filed schedules included Schedule A, listing the debtor’s interest in real property located at 6950 Solano Drive in Camarillo, California. Schedule A reflected a current…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jay Graffen Cass Graffen v. City of Philadelphia, Jay & Cass GraffenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Law Offices of Moore & Moore v. Stoneking (In Re Stoneking)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re SaccoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re O'ConnellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baldwin v. Phillips (In re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2014