Legal Opinion

Trico Products Corp. v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 19, 1943No. 164PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

This petition to review a decision of the Tax Court of the United States redetermining the surtaxes of the petitioner under § 102 of the Revenue Act of 1934? 26 U.S.C. A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 690, for the years 1934 and 1935, puts in issue whether or not there was substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the petitioner was “availed of for the purpose of preventing the imposition of the surtax upon its shareholders * * * through the medium of permitting gains and profits to accumulate instead of being divided or distributed. ijc Jji

The petitioner is a New York…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Chicago Stock Yards Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Donruss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. American Metal Products Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  3. Kerr-Cochran, Incorporated, a Nebraska Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  4. World Pub. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Estate of Gilman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API