Legal Opinion

Rudd v. Rudd

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for divorce. Heard at the June term., 1892, Bennington county, Munson, J., presiding. The court dismissed the petition as matter of law and the petitioner excepted.

Read the full summary

Petition for divorce. Heard at the June term., 1892, Bennington county, Munson, J., presiding. The court dismissed the petition as matter of law and the petitioner excepted. The following facts were found : “The testimony of the petitioner tended to show that her husband had been an intemperate, man during all their married life, and had been a frequent visitor of liquor saloons, and was often away from home until late at night, sometimes remaining all night; that in 1880 he choked her, without cause, until she was nearly senseless ; that on one occasion, in the winter of 1890, he returned…

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, J.

This case was defended in the court below upon two grounds. ' i. That the cause had been condoned. 2. That the petitioner had herself violated the marriage contract.

The exceptions present no element of condonation. There was no forgiveness by the petitioner, no promise of future kind treatment by the petitionee and no resumption of marital relations after, the assault of June 15, 1890, was committed. On the contrary, the petitioner avoided the petitionee as much as possible, some of the time hiding from him, though remaining in the house with him until the final separation, which was on June…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langdon v. LangdonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lafko v. LafkoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  2. Horton v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Mandelin v. MandelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Christensen v. ChristensenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
  5. Sayles v. SaylesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API