Legal Opinion

Moat v. Ducharme

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 29, 1990No. 89-P-63PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

When their long-term relationship evolved from meaningful to just plain mean, Phyllis K. Moat and William Ducharme sued one another in the Superior Court. A judge of that court, sitting without jury, adroitly sorted out and decided various claims of conversion, embezzlement, battery, and abuse of process. Amidst the vituperation was a claim by Moat that Ducharme’s physical abuse had resulted in her being constructively deprived of the use of their jointly owned residence in Northampton; she also sought partition of that residential property. The Superior Court judge correctly ruled that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Varnum v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. Harker v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Jezo v. JezoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Delta Materials Corp. v. BagdonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Gonzalez v. Pierce-WilliamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Nemet v. Boston Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Shwachman v. MeagherMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Rubin v. RubinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API