Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Rodgers v. Arkansas
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1998No. 97-1940PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Two Arkansas residents brought this qui tam action against the State of Arkansas and the Arkansas Department of Education for allegedly obtaining federal education funding by filing false claims of compliance with federal civil-rights laws, in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 — 3733 (1994). The State and its Department of Education moved to 'dismiss the claim, asserting that it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. The District Court denied the motion, and this appeal followed. We affirm.
*867I.
Arkansas residents…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Marvin v. TroutSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Keshav S. Joshi v. St. Luke's Hospital, Inc. Mohammed Bashiti, United States of America, Movant BelowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Sharp v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Carol Rae Cooper Foulds v. Texas Tech UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. R&F Properties of Lake County, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States ex rel. Gaudineer & Comito, L.L.P. v. IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.