Legal Opinion

FIDELITY RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY v. English

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 1956No. 5-911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an action upon a sickness and accident policy which provides twelve months of benefits for disability “resulting solely from bodily injuries effected directly and independently of all other causes through accidental means.” In appealing from a judgment for the plaintiff the insurer relies upon several clauses in the policy to support its denial of liability.

It is contended that the appellee’s disability did not result solely from accidental means, within the language quoted above. The undisputed facts are that the appel-lee accidentally stepped on a roofing tack, gangrene developed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. The Travelers Insurance Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Stucker v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Union Life Insurance v. EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. New Empire Ins. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Life and Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Jackson v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API