Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 1993No. Crim. No. 92-228PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIAMOND, Chief Judge.

The court is confronted with the difficulty of sentencing a defendant whose case presents an atypical situation under the United States Sentencing Guidelines which were designed to create a “heartland” of presumptive sentences for typical cases. The defendant pled guilty to one count of distribution of less than 100 grams of heroin within 1,000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 845a *40(1990). The presentence report concluded that defendant is a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines and calculated his sentence accordingly. Defendant strenuously…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert AdamoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Scott Evan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Randolph Thompson, Terrius Wynn, Alcus Todd Thompson, and Donovan DawesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AbbottDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. United States v. MirandaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API