Ludlum v. Wagner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
The complaints in the first four actions are identical except the allegations as to the number of contributions owned and the *780amount claimed by each plaintiff. The fifth action, by Bauer, is in all essentials the same except that he had been released as a member'of the association while the other four had not. The actions were originally brought to recover the proportionate share of the assets of the association belonging to each plaintiff. Each complaint demands an accounting and a dissolution of the association or partnership, a sale of its property and a distribution of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Belanger v. DanaNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Ives v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Mitchell v. TonkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- Patrikes v. J. C. H. Service Stations, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- Bentley v. HurleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
- Sivin v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Jaschke v. WeisenseeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Ludlum v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925