Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Guetersloh

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1996No. 96-1110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

James Craig Guetersloh, relator in this habeas corpus proceeding, challenges the judgment of contempt and the commitment order of the court of appeals sentencing him to 30, 90, and 180 days confinement, to be served concurrently. Because we conclude that the 180-day sentence is void, but in all other respects the judgment and commitment order are valid, we grant the writ of habeas corpus in part.

The court of appeals found that Guetersloh violated the trial court’s permanent injunction against putting his property to certain uses adjudicated as a nuisance and a violation of a settlement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ex Parte JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re BoyoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. in Re Chris Evan Reynolds, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  3. in Re Chris Evan Reynolds, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  4. in Re Connie HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. in Re Gina P. Honermann-Garinger, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API