Wallace v. State

The majority affirms Emmett Grady Wallace’s convictions for chemical endangerment of a child, § 26-15-3.2(a), Ala. Code 1975, and first-degree unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, § 13A-12-218, Ala.Code 1975. I concur with the majority’s affirmance of the chemical-endangerment conviction. I disagree with the majority’s resolution of Wallace’s challenge to the unlawful-manufacture convic*223tion and respectfully dissent as to the portions of the opinion discussing the two issues related to that conviction.

Wallace argues that the trial court erred when it denied the motion for a judgment…