Legal Opinion
Carnes v. Estate of Carnes
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 2007No. 90A02-0511-CV-1082PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Pro-se appellant-petitioner John Carnes (“Carnes”) appeals from a default judgment in the Wells Circuit Court after he failed to appear for the hearing. Concluding that Carnes failed to first file a Trial Rule 60(B) motion with the trial court and that he has also failed to make any cogent argument, we affirm. In addition, as per its request, we award the Estate of Lawrence Carnes (“the Estate”) appellate attorney’s fees and remand this cause to the trial court for a determination as to the amount of fees.
Facts and Procedural History
This case is predicated upon a will…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. MetzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Shand Mining, Inc. v. Clay County Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kalwitz v. KalwitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Poulard v. LaPorte County Election BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gariup Construction Co. v. Carras-Szany-Kuhn & Associates, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Carter v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- I.A.E., Inc. and William LazarusIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.