Groffi v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The claimant1 appeals here because the Board2 denied him benefits on the ground that he voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of necessitous and compelling reason.3
*424In December of 1978, the claimant, a college professor, was advised by tbe dean of tbe college4 tbat, due to tbe continuing nature of tbe claimant’s unsatisfactory performance,5 tbe dean was recommending to tbe president of tbe college tbat tbe claimant’s services be terminated at tbe end of tbe academic year.6 Later tbe same day tbe claimant, wbo argues tbat be believed tbe dean’s recommendation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Rinehart v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Zibelman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Department of the Navy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Torsky v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- PECO Energy Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Scott v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.