Legal Opinion

Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor Leasing

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1999No. 98-2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowman, Chief J.

The Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund and its trustees (collectively, the Fund), plaintiffs in the underlying case, appeal from the post-judgment, order of the District Court 2 denying their motion for sanctions against the law firm of Dysart Taylor Lay Cotter & McMonigle and three individual attorneys who represented the defendants in the underlying ease. The Fund filed its motion pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking sanctions for “defense counsel’s manipulation of the judicial system.” Brief of Appellants at xv. We remand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Chicago Truck Drivers v. BROTHER. OF LABOR LEASINGDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
  3. United States v. Harvey ReaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API