Legal Opinion

Velasquez v. Reno

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1999No. CIV. A. 99-806 MTBPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, District Judge.

On December 16, 1998, based on a nineteen year old conviction for which he received probation, petitioner, Jose Velasquez, was taken into custody by agents of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”). Petitioner is being manda-torily detained, without bond and without a hearing on bond, pursuant to section 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), pending removal proceedings. He seeks a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, arguing that § 1226(c) cannot be retroactively applied to him as he was released…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ADENIJIiBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  2. ROJASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
  3. Quezada-Bucio v. RidgeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
  4. Garcia v. ShanahanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Alikhani v. FasanoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API