Legal Opinion

Hall v. Glidden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Exceptions from Nisi Prius, Cutting, J., presiding. Assuhpsit, on account annexed. The plaintiff was a cordwainer, and the account mostly consisted of items pertaining to his trade. To support his account, his book containing the charges, with his suppletory oath, was admitted against the objection of defendant.

Read the full summary

On Exceptions from Nisi Prius, Cutting, J., presiding. Assuhpsit, on account annexed. The plaintiff was a cordwainer, and the account mostly consisted of items pertaining to his trade. To support his account, his book containing the charges, with his suppletory oath, was admitted against the objection of defendant. It appeared, that he did but a small business; that his charges were first made upon a slate until it was full, and in from two to four weeks from the time they were so entered when the work was done, he transferred them to his book. An account in set-off was duly filed, and among…

1Opinion of the CourtAppleton, J.

— The verdict in this case was rendered by the jury for the sum of sixteen cents, as the balance in favor of the plaintiff over and above the amount filed in set-off, but both parties being dissatisfied with the result have taken exceptions to the instructions of the presiding Judge, in accordance with which the jury must be presumed to have acted in the discharge of their duty.

The plaintiff was introduced with his book and testified that the charges therein were first made on a slate, when the work was done; that he was accustomed to continue making them till it was full; that he then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Witter v. WitterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charnley v. SibleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. Redlich v. BauerleeIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Deitz v. McVeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  5. Cahn v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API