Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alexander v. Lafayette Crime Stoppers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 2010No. 10-C-814Published

1DissentKnoll, Justice

1, Finding under the provisions of La. Civ.Code art. 1944 and our civilian tradition Dianne and Herman Alexander are entitled to the rewards offered to the public by the Lafayette Crime Stoppers, the Lafayette Chamber of Commerce, and the Baton Rouge Crime Stoppers, I would grant this writ and render judgment awarding the rewards to the Alexanders. Accordingly, for the following reasons, I dissent from the majority’s writ denial.

To fully understand the significance of the present case, it is important to recall the tragic facts of the South Louisiana Serial Killer-Derrick Todd Lee case:

Charlot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Salbadore v. Crescent Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
  4. Taylor v. American Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Cornelson v. Sun Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API