Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Eakin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 4, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The defendants appealed from their convictions of 1991 violations of the State Building Code with respect to a house in Newton. The Appeals Court reversed those convictions because, in its view, the building inspector had not given the defendants adequate notice under G. L. c. 143, § 51, for many alleged code violations, setting forth “what changes are necessary to meet the requirements” of the building code. Commonwealth v. Eakin, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 693, 697-698 (1997), quoting § 51.

The case was presented to the trial court and to the Appeals Court on the assumption that the notice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WillieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. OlszewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. PeritoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. Sarourt NomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Powers v. Freetown-Lakeville Regional School District CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrandisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Sheehan v. WeaverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Banushi v. DorfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Osorno v. SimoneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Hristoforidis v. FisherMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API