Danny Flores v. City of San Gabriel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
OWENS, Circuit Judge, with whom TROTT, Circuit Judge, joins,
concurring:
I concur fully in the majority’s opinion. I write separately because I believe that our willfulness easelaw in the context of the FLSA statute of limitations is off track.
In McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co., 486 U.S. 128, 108 S.Ct. 1677, 100 L.Ed.2d 115 (1988), the Supreme Court stressed that willfulness was more than mere negligence, and that “[i]f an employer acts un- • reasonably, but not recklessly, in determining its legal obligation,” the two-year FLSA statute of limitations would apply. Id. at 132-35 & n.13, 108…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.