Legal Opinion

Gillman v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

In original habeas corpus proceedings, it is alleged that:

“On, towit, August 17, 1932, the Criminal Court of Duval County, by Honorable James M. Peeler, Judge, in a case designated No. 1434, adjudged petitioner guilty of ‘the offense of Forgery and uttering a forgery,’ and sentenced petitioner to be confined in the State Penitentiary at hard labor for the periods of nine years and four years, respectively. Petitioner was imprisoned and commenced service of said sentences on, to-wit, the 17th day of August, 1932, and with duly earned ‘gain time’ or the commutation allowed by law for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Lake v. McClellandSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. McArthur v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  3. Wright v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API