Legal Opinion

United States v. Hagemann

United States Customs Court

Decided May 29, 1951No. 8007; Entry No. 812604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FoRD, Judge:

This application for a review of the decision and judgment of the trial court was filed under the provisions of title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (a). The involved merchandise is known by the trade name of Liquitol B and O. It “* * * is a combination of chemical compounds that are used in the iron foundries, steel foundries, and steel-producing companies use it.” It was entered at the port of New York upon an invoice dated at Den Haag, Netherlands. The Liquitol B was invoiced and entered at RM 20 per 100 kilos, less 2 per centum on the basis of foreign value, and was appraised at $0.1218…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Geo. E. Mallinson Importing Co.United States Customs Court · 1945
  2. Hagemann v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Geo. E. Mallinson Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hospitaline, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API