Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Litchfield v. O'Donnel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Frank A. O’Donnel and others, as commissioners of taxes and assessments, constituting the board of taxes and assessments of the city of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County. Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 7th day of December, 1905, denying the defendants’ motion to quash, or supersede a writ of certiorari herein.

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, J.:

This appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion to quash or supersede a writ of certiorari, upon several-grounds, the only one requiring consideration beingthat there is a misjoinder of parties inasmuch as the persons united in said petition are not affected in the same manner by the alleged illegalities, errors or inequalities.” The writ was issued to review the iinal determination of the defend*714ants as commissioners of taxes and assessments of the city of New York, the'relators uniting in the'petition under the provisions of - section 250 of the Tax Law .(Laws of 1896, chap.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Washington Building Co. v. FeitnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. People ex rel. Washington Building Co. v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. RizzardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. People ex rel. Litchfield v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. People ex rel. Litchfield v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. River Troy Realties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Assessment & TaxationNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API