Pearson v. Supreme Liberty Life Insurance
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Litz, President:
This is an action on a life, health and accident insurance policy to recover sick benefits under a disability clause entitling the insured to $30.00 a month for one year. Judgment was entered upon a verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff for $353.65, and defendant prosecutes error.
The only specification of defense is that the application of plaintiff for insurance contains misrepresentations relating to his health. The policy recites that it is issued in consideration of the payment of premiums and "the statements and agreements contained in the application * * * which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Campbell v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Coster v. LorillardCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
- Schwarzbach v. Ohio Valley Protective UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Polan v. Travelers Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
- Davis v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- Leftwich v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
- Zurich Insurance v. Uptowner Inns, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1990