Legal Opinion

Pruett-Sharpe Const. v. Hayden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 1995No. 94-1672PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

654 So.2d 241 (1995)

PRUETT-SHARPE CONSTRUCTION and Continental Loss Adjusting Services, Inc., Appellants,

v.

Charles HAYDEN, Appellee.

No. 94-1672.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 26, 1995.

Mary E. Cruickshank of McConnaughhay, Roland, Maida & Cherr, Tallahassee.

Barry Silber of Byrick, Silber & Davis, Pensacola.

SMITH, Senior Judge.

The employer/servicing agent (ESA), appellants, seek reversal of a workers' compensation order in which the JCC set aside a prior order approving a joint petition for lump-sum settlement, found the claimant permanently and totally disabled (PTD)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florida Mining & Materials v. MobleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Ackley v. General Parcel ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frederick v. United AirlinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. GennellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Harris Corp. v. ConnorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Viteritti v. Peakload Inc. of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API