Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robert Schiff v. Lawrence G. Pugh, III, Frederick T. Haas, III, Alexander L. Burns, and Pugh, Accardo, Haas, Radecker & Carey, L.L.C.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 2021No. 2021-CA-0267Published

1Dissent

ROBERT SCHIFF * NO. 2021-CA-0267 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL LAWRENCE G. PUGH, III, * FOURTH CIRCUIT FREDERICK T. HAAS, III, ALEXANDER L. BURNS, AND * STATE OF LOUISIANA PUGH, ACCARDO, HAAS, RADECKER & CAREY, L.L.C. * * ******* LEDET, J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS RML I would find Robert Schiff’s appeal timely. I also would reverse the trial court’s judgment granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Frederick T. Haas, III, and the law firm of Pugh, Accardo, Haas, Radecker & Carey, LLC1, because there are genuine issues of material fact as to causation between the defendants’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  5. Chapital v. Harry Kelleher & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API