Thompson v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion
.ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.
The motion for rehearing is based on the grounds: (1) that “it was only necessary to show that the crops were raised upon” the lands rented,” and that possession or title in the defendant was not .necessary; and (2)' that the 'claimant was not a cotenant, but a subtenant, of the defendant in fi. fa., who alone made the trade renting the 'interest of the owners in the place, and that he rented “their undivided interest in the entire place.” The first of. these propositions states a correct principle of law. In Saulsbury v. McKellar, 55 Ga. 323, cited by movant> it was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barlow v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Saulsbury, Respess & Co. v. McKellarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Smith v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913