Stockwell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentSognier, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I agree with appellant that the judgment should be reversed because the State did not prove an essential element of the crime, compliance with the statutory notice requirement.
OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2) provides that one “commits the offense of criminal trespass when he knowingly and without authority . . . [e]nters upon the land or premises of another person . . . after receiving, prior to such entry, notice from the owner [or] rightful occupant . . . that such entry is forbidden.” (Emphasis supplied.) Inherent in the statutory notice requirement, which is an essential…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Rayburn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Wingfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989