Legal Opinion

Painter v. Widow & Sons

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1907No. S.F. No. 4436PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to compel payment of legacies and making partial distribution of real estate. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Jerome B. Painter died on the sixth day of February, 1883, leaving a will and codicil, which were admitted to probate by the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco on the thirteenth day of April, 1883. The administration of the estate has been pending in said court ever since the last-mentioned date.

In March, 1898, J. Milton Painter, Theodore P. Painter, Adaline Mininger, Grace Mininger, J. Milton Painter, as executor of the will of Margaret Painter, deceased, Josephus Painter, by his guardian, J. Milton Painter, and Thomas B. Cochran, claiming as legatees under the will,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kyle v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Kelly v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Case of Walker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  4. England v. Vestry of Prince George's ParishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  5. Stehn v. HayssenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Estate of McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Henderson v. First National Bank of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. In Re Estate of RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API