Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Lee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 26, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Polh District Court. — Hon. Chaeles A. Bishop, Judge. Action on the covenants against incumbrances in a deed. The court below dismissed the action and rendered judgment against the plaintiff for costs, from which he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

This action was tried to the court, a jury having been waived. The district court found the facts and conclusions of law based thereon as follows: “First. On the-day of-, 1885, the defendant, J. S. Lee, executed to the plaintiff a deed of conveyance for the south half (i) of the southwest quarter (z) of section twenty-one (21), township one hundred (100), range twenty-five (25) west fifth principal meridian, Iowa, with covenants of warranty against incum-brances, except a mortgage of two hundred and sixty-two •dollars and seventy-five hundredths dollars ($262.75). Second. That at the time of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brandt v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  2. Funk v. CreswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  3. Rowley v. JewettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Knadler v. SharpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Watson v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McClure v. DeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Doyle v. EmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Schafroth v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Lippert v. LippertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. First Unitarian Society v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API