Legal Opinion

Blumgart v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1938No. Nos. 10903, 10939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

These are two appeals (one allowed by this court and one by the District Court) from an order denying intervention in the reorganization proceeding of St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, debtor.

The debtor is a large railroad system ■including, as a part thereof, about 252 miles 'of main line and about 60 miles of branch lines formerly owned by the Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Company. After having leased this mileage for many years, legal title to such, as well as to all rolling stock and equipment, was acquired by the debtor in 1928.

In March, 1894, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Swift v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  4. City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Carpenter v. Wabash Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Cassie S. Pennington v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor, and the Debtor's TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. In re Central of Georgia Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1944
  5. In re Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API