Rodda v. Rodda
Oregon Supreme Court
1Dissent
I agree with the majority in the following respects: (1) Dr. Rodda established a bona fide residence in Nevada; (2) The Nevada court had jurisdiction to divorce the parties; (3) The Full Faith and Credit Clause requires the Oregon court to recognize that the plaintiff and defendant are no longer married persons; (4) The effect of the Nevada divorce on the Oregon separate maintenance decree presents a question of Oregon law unaffected by the Full Faith and Credit Clause; (5) The Oregon separate maintenance law relates to the duties between married persons. That statute cannot serve as the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Esenwein v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. EsenweinSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Estin v. EstinNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Kelley v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.