Legal Opinion

Pizzitola v. Galveston County Central Appraisal District

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 11, 1991No. 01-90-00258-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This ease presents the question whether a bee is like a cow. The Pizzitolas argue that their land, foraged by bees, is entitled to an agricultural property designation just as if the land were foraged by cows. We hold bees are not like cows. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Tannie and Mary Jane Pizzitola appeal from a judgment after a bench trial, denying their claim for an open-space land valuation on their entire 66.17-acre track. The Pizzitolas own a 66.17-acre tract of land in La Marque, Galveston County, which has been leased to beekeeping operators…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. M.J. Sheridan & Son Co. v. Seminole Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Ritchey v. Crawford, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Media, Inc. v. Lyles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. CDB Software, Inc. v. Kroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  3. Herter v. Wolfe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Calhoun v. Chase Manhattan Bank (U.S.A.), N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Sands L. Stiefer, Chief Appraiser of the Harris County Appraisal District v. Edward Moers and Daniel Moers, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API