Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grode v. Johnstone

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1895No. Nos. 9557—(339)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the nature of quo warranto at the relation of John S. Grode against Edward R. Johnstone and Robert H. Seng.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto brought to test the right of respondent Johnstone to hold the office of assessor for Ramsey county. The litigation is the result of the very complicated condition of the provisions of the charter *57of the city of St. Paul, when read in connection with other laws bearing upon and .affected by such charter provisions.

Grode, the relator, claims to have been duly appointed to the office of assessor in the month of March of the present year, and to be lawfully entitled to the place. Eespondent Seng makes the same claim, and was made a party to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Arosin v. EhrmantrautSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Simpson v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API