Smith v. City of Melbourne
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Judge.
The City of Melbourne brought a condemnation proceeding against the appellants who in turn counterclaimed for inverse condemnation proceedings on other property which appellants alleged the city had uaken without compensation. The parties stipulated to a consent judgment as to the parcel which the city sought to condemn and thereafted the matter proceeded to a hearing before the court on appellants’ counterclaim for inverse condemnation. The judgment on this issue was adverse to appellants. We find no error in the record and affirm.
Appellants obtained title to their property by a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Indian Rocks Beach South Shore v. EwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Kirkland v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Broward County v. BouldinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. OlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bonifay v. DicksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Brevard County v. BlaskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- City of Hollywood v. ZinkilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- City of Jacksonville v. HornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Scott M. Favre v. Jourdan River Estates, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.