Chalmers v. Willis
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentHammond, C. J.
I accept the majority’s statement of the facts with only minor additions later mentioned, but I cannot accept their conclusion. Although the precise question here involved is one of first impression in Maryland the application of well-established rules regarding the assumption of risk and causation leads me to conclude that as a matter of law there was an assumption by Mrs. Chalmers of the risk of misfortunes which might result from Mrs. Willis’ inexperience, and that the risk assumed was the cause of the accident which resulted in Mrs. Chalmers’ injury.
The doctrine of assumption of risk…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Gibson v. BEAVER AND SOUTHERN STATES HOWARD COUNTY PETROLEUM COOP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Bull Steamship Lines v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Roberts v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.