Legal Opinion

Brayton v. Dager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

We first consider upon this appeal the question whether a distributee of the estate of a deceased owner of national bank stock is liable for an assessment levied thereupon after the latter’s death.

When Adam Dager died on June 24, 1932, he was a stockholder of record of The Herkimer National Bank, which ceased operations nine months prior to that date. Thereafter the bank was adjudged insolvent and plaintiff was named by the Comptroller of Currency as its receiver. On July 12, 1934, more than two years after decedent’s death, an assessment was levied upon the stockholders of the insolvent bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forrest v. JackSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Seabury v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Laka v. KrystekNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of AbwenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Crane v. ShulerNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wicks v. CarmichaelNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Loughman v. BraunDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  3. Loughman v. KesselmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  4. Martin v. WiniarskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Moore v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API