Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Fry
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The common-law rule was that, after the lapse of seven years without intelligence concerning a person, the presumption of life ceased, and the -burden of proof devolved upon the other party to show that he was alive. Greenleaf on Evidence (15th ed.), § 41; and case note to L. R. A. 1915B, p. 729. In this connection it may be stated that the presumption relates to the fact of death -and not to the time of death. Davie v. Briggs, 97 U. S. 628.
Our statute on the subject is contained in § 4111 of Crawford & Moses ’ Digest, which is as follows:
“Any person…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kennedy v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Wilks v. Mutual Aid UnionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Creekmore v. IzardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Claywell v. Inter-Southern Life Ins. Co. of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Baxter v. BaxterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Creekmore v. IzardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963