Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Fry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The common-law rule was that, after the lapse of seven years without intelligence concerning a person, the presumption of life ceased, and the -burden of proof devolved upon the other party to show that he was alive. Greenleaf on Evidence (15th ed.), § 41; and case note to L. R. A. 1915B, p. 729. In this connection it may be stated that the presumption relates to the fact of death -and not to the time of death. Davie v. Briggs, 97 U. S. 628.

Our statute on the subject is contained in § 4111 of Crawford & Moses ’ Digest, which is as follows:

“Any person…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Kennedy v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Wilks v. Mutual Aid UnionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creekmore v. IzardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Claywell v. Inter-Southern Life Ins. Co. of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Baxter v. BaxterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Creekmore v. IzardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API