Jackson ex dem. Goodrich v. Ogden
New York Supreme Court
THIS xvas an ejectment for lands in Walton,• in the-county of Delaware. The cause was tried at the Delaware circuit, in September, 1809, before Mr. Justice Thompson. The principal facts proved at the trial were the same as stated in the same cause, bn a former motion for a new trial. (See 4 Johns.
Read the full summary
THIS xvas an ejectment for lands in Walton,• in the-county of Delaware. The cause was tried at the Delaware circuit, in September, 1809, before Mr. Justice Thompson. The principal facts proved at the trial were the same as stated in the same cause, bn a former motion for a new trial. (See 4 Johns. Rep. 140.) It was admitted, that S. Wattles, to whom lot No. 16. was patented, had "conveyed the lot to John Harper, who conveyed it, in 1790, to James Hawley, who in 1795, conveyed the same to Robert Freeman and another, all which conveyances referred to the map of partition. The defendants…
1Opinion of the Court
Kent, Ch. J. delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a motion on the part of the plaintiff to set aside the verdict, and for a new trial.
*240When this cause was heretofore before the court, on a like motion on the part of the defendants, a new trial vvas awarded to let in evidence of acts of the lessors of the plaintiff; and the court observed that there -might be gUCh acts as would be sufficient to conclude them. (4 Johns. Rep. 140.)
In considering the present motion, I shall take in one connected view such facts as have been presented to the court upon the former as well as upon the present…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Gwynn v. SchwartzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Jackson ex dem. Erwin v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Meyers v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Hedge v. SimsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.