Legal Opinion

City of Hamtramck v. Roesink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1938No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 39,132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of restitution of premises in a summary proceeding.

In 1930 defendant, for tbe purposes of a baseball, football and recreational stadium, leased premises from plaintiff and, as consideration, sublet other premises to plaintiff. The premises sublet to plaintiff were taken from defendant in a summary proceeding by his lessor and, as a consequence, plaintiff lost right to possession thereof and, inasmuch as such possession was the consideration, in the nature of rental, for plaintiff’s lease and continuance thereof, plaintiff gave notice of forfeiture and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cohn v. Mary Lee Candies, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API