Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Craig v. County of Chatham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 2001No. COA00-15Published

1ConcurrenceHudson, Judge

I concur with the result reached by the majority. I write separately because, although I agree that the Swine Ordinance regulations and the Health Board Rules may be identical in substance, I believe the reason the Health Board Rules may not stand is distinct from the reason the Swine Ordinance may not stand.

I agree with the majority that the General Assembly has preempted the field of swine farm regulations. I also agree with the proposition that the regulations in question therefore may not stand unless they are found to have been enacted pursuant to some specific statutory exception, such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Roanoke Rapids v. PeedinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API