Legal Opinion

Russell v. Sobel, Bernstein & Greene Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1988No. 86-767Published

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Johnnie Ruth Russell and Robert Russell, appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Sobel, Bernstein & Greene Company (“Sobel”) in accordance with the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. The Russells alleged that Johnnie Ruth sustained bodily injuries as a result of Sobel’s negligent manufacture or design of a pair of shoes that she purchased. On appeal, the Russells argue that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding evidence that would have shown the occurrence of other incidents of the same, or a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. LefanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Hertz v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Van MarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Schlaff v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. M.C. West, Inc. v. BattagliaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API